TDM: Trustworthy Decision-Making Via Interpretability Enhancement
نویسندگان
چکیده
Human-robot interactive decision-making is increasingly becoming ubiquitous, and trust an influential factor in determining the reliance on autonomy. However, it not reasonable to systems that are beyond our comprehension, typical machine learning data-driven black-box paradigms impede interpretability. Therefore, critical establish computational trustworthy mechanisms enhanced by interpretability-aware strategies. To this end, we propose a Trustworthy Decision-Making (TDM) framework, which integrates symbolic planning into sequential decision-making. The framework learns interpretable subtasks result complex, higher-level composite task can be formally evaluated using proposed metric. TDM enables subtask-level interpretability design converges optimal plan from learned subtasks. Moreover, TDM-based algorithm introduced demonstrate unification of with other sequential-decision making algorithms, reaping benefits both. Experimental results validate effectiveness trust-score-based while improving
منابع مشابه
Trustworthy Decision Making via Commitments
Existing approaches to calculate trust between agents rely on the strength of their relationships based on their degrees of friendship, the frequencies of their interactions, the sentiments extracted from their interactions, and so on. These approaches rely heavily on numerical measures and disregard the deep structure underlying trust. By contrast, we establish the idea of trust among agents b...
متن کاملInterpretability via Model Extraction
e ability to interpret machine learning models has become increasingly important now that machine learning is used to inform consequential decisions. We propose an approach called model extraction for interpreting complex, blackbox models. Our approach approximates the complex model using a much more interpretable model; as long as the approximation quality is good, then statistical properties...
متن کاملGroup Decision Making via Probabilistic Belief Merging
We propose a probabilistic-logical framework for group decision-making. Its main characteristic is that we derive group preferences from agents’ beliefs and utilities rather than from their individual preferences as done in social choice approaches. This can be more appropriate when the individual preferences hide too much of the individuals’ opinions that determined their preferences. We intro...
متن کاملTowards Decision Making via Expressive Probabilistic Ontologies
We propose a framework for automated multi-attribute decision making, employing the probabilistic non-monotonic description logics proposed by Lukasiewicz in 2008. Using this framework, we can model artificial agents in decision-making situation, wherein background knowledge, available alternatives and weighted attributes are represented via probabilistic ontologies. It turns out that extending...
متن کاملBalancing accuracy, complexity and interpretability in consumer credit decision making: A C-TOPSIS classification approach
Accuracy, complexity and interpretability are very important in credit classification. However, most approaches cannot perform well in all the three aspects simultaneously. The objective of this study is to put forward a classification approach named C-TOPSIS that can balance the three aspects well. C-TOPSIS is based on the rationale of TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Id...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IEEE transactions on emerging topics in computational intelligence
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2471-285X']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tetci.2021.3084290